Increase your income using e-mail marketing


blanketmail.com keyword stats



Most current Google search phrases:

guard and pro printers laser
Most current MSN search phrases:

Play Gams Play More Gams
Kids Gams raceing games
www.bratz games.com Bratz Games Online
bratz dress up games.com fun and gams
play porno games www.porno game.com
car gams for kids www.cool car games.com
gams for kids www.bike gams.com
Bratz Games Kids kids gams
sonic gams www.free online gams.com#
Bratz gams spanish dictonary
Free Online Dragonballz Games free sonic games.online.com
WWW.Bratz Games.com free raceing games
armygames www.dress gams.com
Free Dragonballz Game On Line bratz games
raceing games.com Bratz Games Play Online
www bratz/games.com all football gams
spanish english dictonary most fun gams
"kids bowling games" english to spanish dictonary
www.most fun gams.com bratz games.com
free car raceing games Free Bratz Games
fighting gams 3  

Public Procurement and Very Private Benefits

In every national budget, there is a partPublic competitive bidding is not
called "Public Procurement". This is thecorruption-proof: many times officials and
portion of the budget allocated to purchasingbidders collude and conspire to award the
services and goods for the variouscontract against bribes and other, noncash,
ministries, authorities and other arms of thebenefits. But we still know of no better way
executive branch. It was the famousto minimize the effects of human
management consultant, Parkinson, who oncegreed.Procurement policies, procedures and
wrote that government officials are likely totenders are supervised by state auditing
approve a multi-billion dollar nuclear powerauthorities. The most famous is, probably,
plant much more speedily that they are likelythe General Accounting Office, known by its
to authorize a hundred dollar expenditure onacronym: the GAO.It is an unrelenting, very
a bicycle parking device. This is becausethorough and dangerous watchdog of the
everyone came across 100 dollar situations inadministration. It is considered to be highly
real life - but precious few had the fortuneeffective in reducing procurement - related
to expend with billions of USD.This,irregularities and crimes. Another such
precisely, is the problem with publicinstitutions the Israeli State Reviser. What
procurement: people are too acquainted withis common to both these organs of the state
the purchased items. They tend to confuseis that they have very broad authority. They
their daily, household-type, decisions withpossess (by law) judicial and criminal
the processes and considerations which shouldprosecution powers and they exercise it
permeate governmental decision making. Theywithout any hesitation. They have the legal
label perfectly legitimate decisions asobligation to review the operations and
"corrupt" - and totally corrupt procedures asfinancial transactions of all the other
"legal" or merely "legitimate", because thisorgans of the executive branch. Their teams
is what was decreed by the statal mechanisms,select, each year, the organs to be reviewed
or because "this is the law".Procurement isand audited. They collect all pertinent
divided to defence and non-defence spending.documents and correspondence. They cross the
In both these categories - but, especially ininformation that they receive from elsewhere.
the former - there are grave, well founded,They ask very embarrassing questions and they
concerns that things might not be all whatdo it under the threat of perjury
they seem to be.Government - from India's toprosecutions. They summon witnesses and they
Sweden's to Belgium's - fell because ofpublish damning reports which, in many cases,
procurement scandals which involved bribeslead to criminal prosecutions.Another form of
paid by manufacturers or service providersreview of public procurement is through
either to individual in the service of thepowers granted to the legislative arm of the
state or to political parties. Other, lesserstate (Congress, Parliament, Bundestag, or
cases, litter the press daily. In the lastKnesset). In almost every country in the
few years only, the burgeoning defence sectorworld, the elected body has its own
in Israel saw two such big scandals: theprocurement oversight committee. It
developer of Israel's missiles was involvedsupervises the expenditures of the executive
in one (and currently is serving a jailbranch and makes sure that they conform to
sentence) and Israel's military attache tothe budget. The difference between such
Washington was implicated - though, neversupervisory, parliamentary, bodies and their
convicted - in yet another.But the picture isexecutive branch counterparts - is that they
not that grim. Most governments in the Westfeel free to criticize public procurement not
succeeded in reigning in and fullyonly in the context of its adherence to
controlling this particular budget item. Inbudget constraints or its cleanliness - but
the USA, this part of the budget remainedalso in a political context. In other words,
constant in the last 35(!) years at 20% ofthese committees do not limit themselves to
the GDP.There are many problems with publicasking HOW - but also engage in asking WHY.
procurement. It is an obscure area of stateWhy this specific expense in this given time
activity, agreed upon in "customized" tendersand location - and not that expense,
and in dark rooms through a series ofsomewhere else or some other time. These
undisclosed agreements. At least, this is theelected bodies feel at liberty - and often do
public image of these expenditures.The truth- intervene in the very decision making
is completely different.True, some ministersprocess and in the order of priorities. They
use public money to build their privatehave the propensity to alter both quite
"empires". It could be a private businessoften.The most famous such committee is,
empire, catering to the financial future ofarguably, the Congressional Budget Office
the minister, his cronies and his relatives.(CBO). It is famous because it is
These two plagues - cronyism and nepotism -non-partisan and technocratic in nature. It
haunt public procurement. The spectre ofis really made of experts which staff its
government official using public money tooffices.Its apparent - and real - neutrality
benefit their political allies or theirmakes its judgements and recommendations a
family members - haunts public imaginationcommandment not to be avoided and, almost
and provokes public indignation.Then, thereuniversally, to be obeyed. The CBO operates
are problems of plain corruption: bribes orfor and on behalf of the American Congress
commissions paid to decision makers in returnand is, really, the research arm of that
for winning tenders or awarding of economicvenerable parliament. Parallelly, the
benefits financed by the public money. Again,executive part of the American system - the
sometimes these moneys end in secret bankAdministration - has its own guard against
accounts in Switzerland or in Luxembourg. Atwaste and worse: the Office of Management and
other times, they finance politicalBudget (OMB).Both bodies produce learned,
activities of political parties. This wasthickset, analyses, reports, criticism,
rampantly abundant in Italy and has its placeopinions and recommendations. Despite quite a
in France. The USA, which was considered toprodigious annual output of verbiage - they
be immune from such behaviours - has provenare so highly regarded, that virtually
to be less so, lately, with the Bill Clintonanything that they say (or write) is minutely
alleged election financinganalysed and implemented to the last letter
transgressions.But, these, with all duewith an air of awe.Only a few other
respect to "clean hands" operations andparliaments have committees that carry such
principles, are not the main problems ofweight. The Israeli Knesset have the
public procurement.The first order problem isextremely powerful Finance Committee which is
the allocation of scarce resources. In otherin charge of all matters financial, from
words, prioritizing. The needs are enormousappropriations to procurement. Another
and ever growing. The US government purchasesparliament renowned for its tight scrutiny is
hundreds of thousands of separate items fromthe French Parliament - though it retains
outside suppliers. Just the list of thesevery few real powers.But not all countries
goods - not to mention their technicalchose the option of legislative supervision.
specifications and the documentation whichSome of them relegated parts or all of these
accompanies the transactions - occupies tensfunctions to the executive arm.In Japan, the
of thick volumes. Supercomputers are used toMinistry of Finance still scrutinizes (and
manage all these - and, even so, it ishas to authorize) the smallest expense, using
getting way out of hand. How to allocate everan army of clerks. These clerks became so
scarcer resources amongst these items is apowerful that they have the theoretical
daunting - close to impossible - task. Itpotential to secure and extort benefits
also, of course, has a political dimension. Astemming from the very position that they
procurement decision reflects a politicalhold. Many of them suspiciously join
preference and priority. But the decisioncompanies and organizations which they
itself is not always motivated by rational -supervised or to which they awarded contracts
let alone noble - arguments. More often, it- immediately after they leave their
is the by product and end result of lobbying,previous, government, positions. The Ministry
political hand bending and extortionistof Finance is subject to a major reform in
muscle. This raises a lot of hackles amongthe reform-bent government of Prime Minister
those who feel that were kept out of the porkHashimoto. The Japanese establishment finally
barrel. They feel underprivileged andrealized that too much supervision, control,
discriminated against. They fight back andauditing and prosecution powers might be a
the whole system finds itself in a quagmire,Pyrrhic victory: it might encourage
a nightmare of conflicting interests. Lastcorruption - rather than discourage
year, the whole budget in the USA was stuck -it.Britain opted to keep the discretion to
not approved by Congress - because of theseuse public funds and the clout that comes
reactions and counter-reactions.The secondwith it in the hands of the political level.
problem is the supervision, auditing andThis is a lot like the relationship between
control of actual spending. This has twothe butter and the cat left to guard it.
dimensions:How to make sure that theStill, this idiosyncratic British arrangement
expenditures match and do not exceed theworks surprisingly well. All public
budgetary items. In some countries, this is aprocurement and expenditure items are
mere ritual formality and governmentapproved by the EDX Committee of the British
departments are positively expected toCabinet (=inner, influential, circle of
overstep their procurement budgets. Ingovernment) which is headed by the Ministry
others, this constitutes a criminalof Finance. Even this did not prove enough to
offence.How to prevent the criminally corruptrestrain the appetites of Ministers,
activities that we have described above - orespecially as quid pro quo deals quickly
even the non criminal incompetent acts whichdeveloped. So, now the word is that the new
government officials are prone to do.The mostLabour Prime Minister will chair it- enabling
widespread method is the public, competitive,him to exert his personal authority on
tender for the purchases of goods andmatters of public money.Britain, under the
services.But, this is not as simple as itprevious, Tory, government also pioneered an
sounds.Some countries publish internationalinteresting and controversial incentive
tenders, striving to secure the best qualitysystem for its public servants as top
in the cheapest price - no matter what is itsgovernment officials are euphemistically
geographical or political source. Othercalled there. They receive, added to their
countries are much more protectionistsalaries, a portion of the savings that they
(notably: Japan and France) and they publisheffect in their departmental budgets. This
only domestic tenders, in most cases. Ameans that they get a small fraction of the
domestic tender is open only to domesticend of the fiscal year difference between
bidders. Yet other countries limittheir budget allowances and what they
participation in the tenders on variousactually spent. This is very useful in
backgrounds: the size of the competingcertain segments of government activity - but
company, its track record, its ownershipcould prove very problematic in others.
structure, its human rights or environmentalImagine health officials saving on medicines,
record and so on. Some countries publish theor others saving on road maintenance or
minutes of the tender committee (which has toeducational consumables. This, naturally,
explain WHY it selected this or thatwill not do.Needless to say that no country
supplier). Others keep it a closely guardedofficially approves of the payment of bribes
secret ("to protect commercial interests andor commission to officials in charge of
secrets").But all countries state in advancepublic spending, however remote the
that they have no obligation to accept anyconnection is between the payment and the
kind of offer - even if it is the cheapest.actions.Yet, law aside many countries accept
This is a needed provision: the cheapest isthe intertwining of elites - business and
not necessarily the best. The cheapest offerpolitical - as a fact of life, albeit a sad
could be coming from a very unreliableone. Many judicial systems in the world even
supplier with a bad past performance or amake a difference between a payment which is
criminal record or from a supplier who offersnot connected to an identifiable or
goods of shoddy quality.The tenderingdiscernible benefit and those that are. The
policies of most of the countries in thelatter - and only the latter - are labelled
world also incorporates a second principle:"bribery".Where there is money - there is
that of "minimum size". The cost of running awrongdoing. Humans are humans - and sometimes
tender is prohibitive in the cases ofnot even that.But these unfortunate
purchases in small amounts.Even if there isderivatives of social activity can be
corruption in such purchases it is bound tominimized by the adoption of clear
cause less damage to the public purse thanprocurement policies, transparent and public
the costs of the tender which is supposed todecision making processes and the right mix
prevent it!So, in most countries, smallof supervision, auditing and prosecution.
purchases can be authorized by governmentEven then the result is bound to be dubious,
officials - larger amounts go through aat best.
tedious, multi-phase tendering process.



1 A B C D 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108